9 UWQHD monitors review: wide, wider, widest

9 Ultra wide QHD-monitors on the test bench

By


Test results brightness and contrast

We compared nine 34-inch UWQHD-monitors. As always, we tested the monitors straight out of the box. In the graphs on this page and the next we indicate the curved monitors with a red bar; the non-curved monitors have a blue bar. 

Brightness max.

The maximum brightness is important for being able to use a display in bright environments. We measure this in candela per square metre (cd/m²), which was previously also referred to as "nit". The rule of thumb is that 200 candelas per square metre is sufficient. For office environments the threshold usually is 250 cd/m². 

All models are ample bright, with the Samsung leading the pack.

Brightness min.

The minimum brightness is a good indication for how rich in contrast a display is. After all, a decrease in minimum brightness has more influence on the contrast ratio than an even larger increase in maximum brightness. Since TFT panels always feature a light source, achieving a brightness of 0 cm/m2 is almost impossible. Only VA screens are able to get close to that. 

This is where the VA-panels (HP, Samsung) clearly separate themselves from the IPS-panels. Noteworthy for HP as for Samsung is that the measured minimum not extraordinarily low - we are used to seeing better of the VA-technology. Nevertheless the difference is evident.

Contrast

As mentioned before we are unfortunately unable to do a checkerboard-reading with these panels in our test. We will have to keep to the maximum contrast. Again we see the VA-panels taking the lead, otherwise predictable values of about 1000:1. Dell scores the lowest, but beware: this is a calibrated screen and in our experience this is always at the expense of the maximum contrast. In the end it is not bad at all.


Also read these monitor articles on Hardware.Info

The Hardware.Info website uses cookies.
*